Re: Gump and Jaxp

Sam Ruby wrote:
> While Gump in general will (likely) run on JDK 1.2, IMHO, there is no 
> reason that the profile/gump.xml to be able to do so.  In fact, it will 
> likely fail as a number of projects within it have moved up.
> 
> Any volunteers to remove these dependencies?

Yep, I can do that.

> 
>> I downloaded the latest XML pack from Sun recently but this is now 
>> newer than that used by Gump, so I symlinked it.
> 
> 
> I'd like to see Gump's dependencies stay current, so instead of 
> symlinks, I would prefer to see gump's profile updated.
> 

Agreed. I normally just get things working first and then update. I'll 
update this too, although perhaps it will become moot due to the above.

Conor