Re: Gump and Jaxp?
Sam Ruby <[email protected]> Thu, 02 Jan 2003 10:11:47 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.alexandria.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Conor MacNeill wrote: > >> Works for me on linux, fails on windows. Here's the -verbose output: >> >> This doesn't make any sense to me... > > OK, path separator is at least one issue. I won't have access to a > windows box for another week (I'm on leave at the moment - hooray) so > I'll try to sort it out then. Doesn't appear to be a path separator issue. I issue the indicated command directly from the command line, and it appears to do the right thing. > > > > I sure hope that gump's build.xml doesn't ever rely on new features that > > are added to ant... > > > >> ... cool! And since I always bootstrap and then use the latest >> version of ant, this won't cause me any problems. ;-) >> > > It seems as if the above two statements (which I have juxtaposed) are > contradictory. Is it OK for Gump's build.xml to use unreleased Ant > features? They were meant to be contraditory. You were supposed to connect the dots (literally). ;-) As long as Gump can bootstrap, I am happy. However, those newbies that you were about to lead down the garden path may find it troublesome... - Sam Ruby