Re: Gump and Jaxp?

Sam Ruby <[email protected]> Thu, 02 Jan 2003 10:11:47 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.alexandria.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Conor MacNeill wrote:
> 
>> Works for me on linux, fails on windows.  Here's the -verbose output:
>>
>> This doesn't make any sense to me...
> 
> OK, path separator is at least one issue. I won't have access to a 
> windows box for another week (I'm on leave at the moment - hooray) so 
> I'll try to sort it out then.

Doesn't appear to be a path separator issue.  I issue the indicated 
command directly from the command line, and it appears to do the right 
thing.

>  >
>  > I sure hope that gump's build.xml doesn't ever rely on new features that
>  > are added to ant...
>  >
> 
>> ... cool!  And since I always bootstrap and then use the latest 
>> version of ant, this won't cause me any problems.  ;-)
>>
> 
> It seems as if the above two statements (which I have juxtaposed) are 
> contradictory. Is it OK for Gump's build.xml to use unreleased Ant 
> features?

They were meant to be contraditory.  You were supposed to connect the 
dots (literally).  ;-)

As long as Gump can bootstrap, I am happy.  However, those newbies that 
you were about to lead down the garden path may find it troublesome...

- Sam Ruby