Re: [maven] maven -> gump project conversion

[email protected] wrote:
> 
> I've done what looks like a first attempt at mapping the maven project ids 
> to gump projects.
> 
> Could you please check it out, especially the one's I've marked "not built 
> by gump" and let me know of any others?
> 
> You can find it here:
> 
> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-turbine-maven/src/plugins-build/gump/maven2gump.properties?rev=1.3&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
> 
> With this, the fulcrum descriptor turns out right.

BSF looks problematic.  Most still use "bsf" for now.  Some use 
"jakarta-bsf".  Both are different codebases (renamed packages, for 
starters).

servletapi has a related issue due to versioning.  To a smaller extent, 
cactus shares this.

Most of the excalibur "blades" *are* built by gump.

> Also, is there a naming convention in the gump project names? For Jakarta 
> and xml repositories it appears that the repo is prefixed, but for 
> sourceforge, werken this doesn't appear to be happening.

Gump typically uses the name one uses to check out the source, for 
example, "jakarta-ant" and "werken".  For subprojects, the parent is 
typically shortened to the last token.

- Sam Ruby