Re: cvs commit: jakarta-gump/project jakarta-ant.xml jakarta-commons.xml jakarta-taglibs.xml uddi4j.xml xml-crimson.xml xml-xerces.xml
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[email protected]> Mon, 06 Jan 2003 13:02:41 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.alexandria.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.gump |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Leo Simons wrote: > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > >>> To solve the centipede problem @ apache: simply make the gump repo a >>> requirment for building the project! That might also help 'edjucate' >>> ignorant developers (like, until recently, me) about the wonders and >>> importance of gump. >> [...] >> Doesn't it also have to work? > > > Nicola, I'm really not trying to make your life harder, or make your job > on centipede more difficult. Really. But fact-of-the-matter, right now, > and for the past few months, the avalon peeps (including you and me) > have been terrible at maintaining gump descriptors (or even the build > process), and until I see things work differently (I've been trying) I'm > thinking along the same lines Sam is. For Avalon, as for any *Ant* project, now that Gump is open to all Apache, I agree. I have in fact moved now the descriptor back in Gump CVS. My point is about *Centipede* projects. POI now builds fine with Gump, and it uses Centipede. If Centipede makes it compulsory to have a descriptor just to do normal builds, I reckon that putting the descriptor in Gump CVS is not needed, and even, as I'm trying to suggest, a problem. [...] >> Honestly, Leo, imagine you're a Centipede developer. And you want to >> give an easy build system to your users. Do you really think that your >> proposal is a real solution? > > > well, no (and it's not to be taken as a proposal ;). But it is the > easiest thing that could possibly work (in that I could probably set it > up). I'm totally supportive for real solutions, but I'm okay with hacky > solutions until those real solutions arrive (to paraphrase Berin > "waiting until the next release of [the maven and centipede] projects"). Yes, I agree too. I was thinking about the conceptual idea of having descriptors for Centipede projects in Gump CVS, and how this would make things difficult for Centipede projects. >> Look at it from my perspective too. > > I am, I am! :-) -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [email protected] - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------