Re: cvs commit: jakarta-gump/project jakarta-ant.xml jakarta-commons.xml jakarta-taglibs.xml uddi4j.xml xml-crimson.xml xml-xerces.xml
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[email protected]> Mon, 06 Jan 2003 16:10:01 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.alexandria.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.gump |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sam Ruby wrote: > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > >> I was thinking about the conceptual idea of having >> descriptors for Centipede projects in Gump CVS, and how this would >> make things difficult for Centipede projects. > > Suggestion: let's just note that it is very easy to move descriptors. > > For ASF projects which are not (yet) centipede based, the path of least > resistance seems to be to put them in the gump cvs repository. > > Given the current implementation of Centipede, the path of least > resistance for projects which are currently and actively using centipede > is to put such project descriptors in the project cvs. > > Moving project descriptors in anticipation of future use seems > counter-productive at this time. > > Future versions of gump or centipede (or centigump or gumpipede or > whatever) may change these observations. [...] > Peace? :-) I agree on all the line. Well said. Thank you. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [email protected] - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------