Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CycloneDX Ant Library 0.1 Based on RC1

+1

I've been reading up on the CycloneDX standards and other relevant 
material. Based on what I have understood so far, this release looks 
good to me. One minor suggestion (not for this release, but maybe future 
ones) is whether we should use "*.bom.json" as the file/artifact names 
instead of the current "*.cyclonedx.json". When I first heard about 
cyclonedx it wasn't clear to me what it was, but BOM on the other hand 
is a bit more known term. Plus, as per 
https://github.com/CycloneDX/specification#recognized-file-patterns , 
"bom.json" is a recognized file pattern for such files. So perhaps we 
should consider that name?

-Jaikiran

On 31/05/26 9:42 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> I want to point out
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheant-1070/org/apache/ant/ant-cyclonedx/0.1/ant-cyclonedx-0.1-cyclonedx.json
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/antlibs/cyclonedx/binaries/apache-ant-cyclonedx-0.1-bin-withdeps.tar.bz2.cyclonedx.json
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/antlibs/cyclonedx/binaries/apache-ant-cyclonedx-0.1-bin.tar.bz2.cyclonedx.json
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/antlibs/cyclonedx/source/apache-ant-cyclonedx-0.1-src.tar.bz2.cyclonedx.json
>
> and their XML siblings.
>
> Not only because they've been created by the RC itself, but also because
> they are part of the release artifacts.
>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>