RE: Exceptions (was: RE: [Avalon4:PROPOSAL] Context Consensus)

"Berin Loritsch" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.apps.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[email protected]]
> 
> In such a scenario, I would put in place a test case that did the 
> casting - and avoid object activation whenever possible.  For 
> example, I 
> will typically use the methof hasService( key ) on the 
> ServiceManger to 
> validate that the key is available - but I will pass on the service 
> manager to subsidiary components without actually getting the 
> value of 
> the key - that because in the assembly API service don't get 
> activated 
> until they are actually needed - that makes lookup an expensive 
> operation on the first hit operation.  What would be better in that 
> scenario would be a hasService( key, class ) method where class is 
> parameter that is the target cast class and the implementation of the 
> service manger can validate if the candidate object 
> implements the class 
> without necessarily instantiating it.
> 
> The same logic applies to a new or revised context interface.

It is still a fragile contract.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.