Re: [Avalon4:PROPOSAL] Context Consensus

On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 23:12, Leo Sutic wrote:
> > From: Darrell DeBoer [mailto:[email protected]]
> > I certainly don't plan to fight tooth and nail over it.
> > However, I've yet to see any argument where the benefits of
> > requiring a castable context outweigh the added complexity.
> > So yep, I still feel the same way; I'd rather keep the context
> > simple.
>
> Are your opposition strong enough that you would veto it with a
> -1, or is it of the "would accept it with a -0"-kind? (Read
> below, I'll clarify some points.) The reason I'm asking is that
> there is some consensus that this proposal would be acceptable
> (not that everyone is crazy about it, but it is common ground,
> which is more than we've had so far) to all.

Just a -0, and a non-binding one at that. I think I'll just let it go...
(Call me beaten into submission ;)

-- 
cheers,
Darrell DeBoer