RE: [Avalon4:PROPOSAL] Context Consensus (version 2)

"Leo Sutic" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.apps.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.devel
Message-ID <001101c2a28a$73473bf0$0801a8c0@Lagrange>

> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[email protected]] 
> 
> Paul Hammant wrote:
>
> > I'm unhappy with anything other than a base interface (Context) or
> > specialised interfaces (e.g. BlockContext)
> 
> 
> I agree

OK, the thing was there to accomodate the current Merlin usage
pattern. If you are both happy with it going, then I'm removing 
it.

  T must be an interface.

(Although I see no need to require that the interface extends the
Context interface.)

/LS
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.