RE: [Avalon4:PROPOSAL] Context Consensus (version 2)
"Leo Sutic" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.apps.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001101c2a28a$73473bf0$0801a8c0@Lagrange> |
> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[email protected]] > > Paul Hammant wrote: > > > I'm unhappy with anything other than a base interface (Context) or > > specialised interfaces (e.g. BlockContext) > > > I agree OK, the thing was there to accomodate the current Merlin usage pattern. If you are both happy with it going, then I'm removing it. T must be an interface. (Although I see no need to require that the interface extends the Context interface.) /LS