Re: [Avalon4:PROPOSAL] Context Consensus (version 2)
Stephen McConnell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.apps.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Leo Sutic wrote: > > >>From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[email protected]] >> >>Paul Hammant wrote: >> >> >> >>>I'm unhappy with anything other than a base interface (Context) or >>>specialised interfaces (e.g. BlockContext) >>> >>> >>I agree >> >> > >OK, the thing was there to accomodate the current Merlin usage >pattern. > Merlin only uses the type attribue value as a cast criteria. I think you getting mixed up between meta-info and meta-data - but I'll answer that one in reply to the other post from yourself. >If you are both happy with it going, then I'm removing >it. > > T must be an interface. > > +1 >(Although I see no need to require that the interface extends the >Context interface.) > > OK. Steve. -- Stephen J. McConnell OSM SARL digital products for a global economy mailto:[email protected] http://www.osm.net