RE: [Avalon4:PROPOSAL] Context Consensus (version 2)

> From: Paul Hammant [mailto:[email protected]]
> 
> I'm unhappy with anything other than a base interface (Context) or 
> specialised interfaces (e.g. BlockContext) being used to descibe 
> parameter0 of contextualize for the IS-A proposition.  Why? K/HC/CAPI 
> separation; separation of interface and impl etc.  As an 
> advocate of the 
> BlockContext (and alike) solution I have no requirement for 
> things like 
> GenericBlockContext (it was a class not an interface).


Could you expand your acronym for me, I am not familiar with it:

K/HC/CAPI