RE: [Avalon4:PROPOSAL] Context Consensus (version 4)

"Leo Sutic" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.apps.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.devel
Message-ID <002201c2a2c4$b6da8860$0801a8c0@Lagrange>

> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[email protected]] 
> 
> Suggestion - replace "package.html#meta" with "package-summary#meta" 
> (otherise it won't work when you convert to javadoc).

Seems like a worthwhile change...
 
> >   NOTE: It is our intent to specify common context entries and 
> >         associated contracts as part of the Framework documentation.
> >         This step has not been taken yet.
> >
> 
> I would replace the above note with the following:
> 
>      Standard Avalon context entries, their keys, types and and
>      associated semantics are defined under the framework standard
>      attributes table.
> 
>      See: <a href="package-summary.html#attributes">
>      Avalon Standard Context Entries Specification</a>
> 
> 
> Plus:
> 
> <a name="attributes"/>
> Standard Avalon Context Entries Specification
> ---------------------------------------------
> Specification of standard attribute entries related to 
> context and is currently under discussion.
> 

Incorporated.

/LS
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.