RE: [Avalon4:PROPOSAL] Context Consensus (version 4)
"Leo Sutic" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.apps.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <002201c2a2c4$b6da8860$0801a8c0@Lagrange> |
> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[email protected]] > > Suggestion - replace "package.html#meta" with "package-summary#meta" > (otherise it won't work when you convert to javadoc). Seems like a worthwhile change... > > NOTE: It is our intent to specify common context entries and > > associated contracts as part of the Framework documentation. > > This step has not been taken yet. > > > > I would replace the above note with the following: > > Standard Avalon context entries, their keys, types and and > associated semantics are defined under the framework standard > attributes table. > > See: <a href="package-summary.html#attributes"> > Avalon Standard Context Entries Specification</a> > > > Plus: > > <a name="attributes"/> > Standard Avalon Context Entries Specification > --------------------------------------------- > Specification of standard attribute entries related to > context and is currently under discussion. > Incorporated. /LS