Re: [Avalon4] Context Consensus - after the vote
Stephen McConnell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.apps.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Leo Sutic wrote: > No, the vote isn't over - just a few notes: > > There have been some last-minute suggestions for changes to the > proposal. I am against changing a proposal while it is being voted on, > and I think it would be a loss to stop the vote, get another version > of the proposal out, and then re-start the vote. In short, there is so > much in the current proposal that we have consensus on that I think it > should go in and not be held up by very small changes. There's always > some improvement that can be done, but at some point one has to say > -OK, this is good enough for now, let's put it in. > > On the other hand, just because something has gone from proposal to > vote it is not automaticaly immune from opposition. > > So, my suggestion is this: We have postponed some things, among them: > > + The metainfo model. > + The metainfo DTD > + The list of standard context keys > + The naming of context keys. > > These things were postponed with the intention that we would deal with > them separately and shortly after this vote. Now, I suggest that > anyone who has a minor change to the current proposal that is enough > to stop you from voting an immediate +1, but not enough to make you -1 > the proposal, that you reply to this message with your concern, and we > can then have a second vote shortly after this vote. That way, these > last-minute changes aren't lost, but neither do we have to restart the > proposal->vote cycle, and no one has to worry that this is the last > chance to provide input regarding the Context interface for the next > two years. > > I already have Paul Hammant suggestion of changing the WARNING-note > attached to the castable context part of the proposal, Peter Donald's > comments regarding the context entry samples, and I promise to take > them up ASAP after this vote ends Tuesday 1200. > > And of course, if you have a major problem with the proposal as it is > now, feel free to -1 it. > > Does this seem like a fair suggestion? Yep. Votes in progress - let's get the result and move on from there. Cheers, Steve. -- Stephen J. McConnell OSM SARL digital products for a global economy mailto:[email protected] http://www.osm.net