Re: [fortress / excalibur] JDK 1.2 dynamic proxies: implementation question, to CGLIB or...

On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 11:30:27AM +0200, Neeme Praks wrote:
> >>Was it really part of Jakarta Commons?
> >I think so (at least it has the same authors).
> >>Why did it leave?
> >good question.
> 
> Nobody knows? I couldn't find anything in the commons-dev list archives 
> either... Chris, can you fill in here?

It was before my time, but far as I can tell from the archives, people
from a number of projects thought it would be useful (commons
lang/reflect/whatever) but no one wanted a dependency on BCEL. The BCEL
committers didn't want to hand out cvs access, and didn't take the
opportunity to pull it from commons-sandbox when it was offered. Juozas,
is that a fair summary?

-Chris