Re: [RT:A5] What are the _real_ concern areas?

Peter Donald <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.apps.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 12:56, Adam Murdoch wrote:
> Goodness.  I just want to get the stuff I need for my component.  Why is it
> so hard?  Why do I need to know all this stuff?  Why isn't there a single
> method that gives me what I need?  What benefit do I get out of all these
> methods and contracts?

The same benefits you get when you asked this last time scalability and 
flexibility. Some component styles don't implement Contextualizable or 
Serviceable/Composable or Configurable/Parameterizable or whatever. Others do 
different things at different stages (ie some containers have replaced 
Comopsable/Serviceable with their own custom lookup lifecycle). 

> Whatever you happen to call this antipattern, taking a single real concern
> and dividing it into several artifical concerns causes problems. 

I don't believe anyone has shown that they are "artifical concerns".

-- 
Cheers,

Peter Donald
--------------------------------------------
 Beer is proof that God loves us and wants 
 us to be happy. -- Benjamin Franklin
--------------------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.