Re: Cornerstone / AltRMI
Stephen McConnell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.apps.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Berin Loritsch wrote: >>From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[email protected]] >> >> >>>However, if it is as simple as *not* casting to a BlockContext, >>>then +1, remove the cast. >>> >>>If it consists of more effort, we should do an initial release and >>>then a neutral release. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>The casting requirements is the only computational issue - >>the rest is >>packaging. >> >> > > >Ok. Let's get rid of the casting. I can probably do that much. >As to packaging, we don't have a standard package architecture >for A4 components. Sad, but true. For the time being, let's >specify that the packaging remains the same. In the future, lets >look at what it would take to at least cooperate between Phoenix >and Merlin. Fortress will follow whatever we agree upon. > > Packaging for Phoenix + Merlin is not a problem - just needs some stuff in the build file and a couple of xml files in the src package (which hyave already been prepared). Phoenix generates content as part of the build process whereas Merlin descriptors are explicit. The content for this has been in place for ages - no issue to make it happen. We can easily make these blocks Phoenix/Merlin savy and get the release out based on this - then move forward with work on the common model. Cheers, Steve. >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[email protected]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > -- Stephen J. McConnell mailto:[email protected] http://www.osm.net