Re: XML Pipelining in Jelly

Probably so,  after all, you need Jelly to use the service anyway so I 
think it would make sense to package it with Jelly, at least for a while.

I haven't approached James about it yet. I want to build it first :-)

Robert


Peter Donald wrote:

>On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 06:12, Robert wrote:
>  
>
>>Actually, we (browsersoft) are going to use Jelly to replace our own XML
>>script engine and I'm going to create a Service to wrap around Jelly for
>>use in an Avalon container (we currently use Excalibur). So if there is
>>interest I'm sure I can talk the boss into donating it.
>>    
>>
>
>I would definetly be interested in seeing it. It may be a better idea to put 
>it inside Jelly for the moment as I think Jelly is still a moving target. 
>What do you think? 
>
>  
>