Re: Cornerstone / AltRMI

Leo Simons wrote:
[...]
> IOW, I don't think adding more meta descriptors gets cornerstone into a
> "container-neutral" state, it is just adding support for more
> "non-standard" containers. Avalon is not at a point where
> "container-neutral metadata" is a reality, or likely to be there anytime
> soon (as in we'll probably take a few months). For cornerstone, stick to
> "minimal metadata targetting released avalon products" and provide a
> migration path to "container-neutral metadata" once we define
> "container-neutral metadata".

[...]

> Note that for longer term I still believe that cornerstone should become
> out-of-scope and the components it contain IMHO should go someplace
> "common". Different issue though.

I agree with your all your analysis.

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   [email protected]
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------