Re: Our site is too big

Nicola Ken Barozzi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.apps.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Berin Loritsch wrote:
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[email protected]]
> 
[...]
> The last time I tried centipede, it was a pain to get working.
> Maven has an easy declaritive document describing meta-info
> necessary for building the project.  It is very intuitive.
>
> Centipede made me feel like I was forced into a box I didn't
> like for the directory structure.  It just wasn't a pleasant
> experience.  OTOH, I haven't looked at Centipede in quite
> a while.  What has changed with it?

Everything. It uses an enhanced Gump descriptor (and works with gump), 
where you define your src, test and docs dirs, has easy buildfile import 
capability, automatic plugin download and installation, ...

Just try it, it's way better. Also Maven has changed a lot since you 
have tried it in comparison with Centipede.

Hence I would propose here, as I did on the James list, to wait for the 
release of both products and decide. It's only fair for both projects.

>>DISCLAIMER: I'm the original author of Centipede.
> 
> I know. ;P

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   [email protected]
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.