Re: Avalon Components (Re: Our site is too big)

Stephen McConnell <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.apps.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:

> I think that we should now decide where to put the Avalon components, 
> if in Apache Commons or Avalon Components.
>
> I'm mildly in favor for avalon-components, where to put cornerstone 
> and excalibur components, and give access to all projects that have a 
> representative in our PMC (as discussed for outer-avalon people in the 
> PMC).


It is my understanding that the notion of an avalon-components is out of 
scope of the Avalon Project.

  RESOLVED, that the Avalon PMC be and hereby is responsible
  for the creation and maintenance of software related to
  component and service management, based on software licensed
  to the Foundation;

Resolution of the conflict between this position and the existing 
Cornerstone and Apps CVS is addressed under the resolution:

  RESOLVED, that the initial Avalon PMC be and hereby is tasked
  with the migration and rationalization of the Jakarta PMC
  Avalon subproject;

Cheers, Steve.

-- 

Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:[email protected]
http://www.osm.net
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.