AW: [A5:RT] Minimum J2ME Specs and Strategy
"Daniel S. Haischt" <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Jan 2003 19:52:43 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.apps.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
hello, the Cell Phone/PDA assumtion only works if you are focusing on the enterprise sector. allthough according to Forrester currently 43% of IT executives are thinking that mobility doesen't matter within their bussiness processes. additionally how would you make clear that your sister/brother needs a cell phone that runs an avalon container ;-) so if somebody refers to the consumer sector while talking about avalon enabled cell phones, i would say there is definitly no need for such a thing ;-) allthough there are great potentials in the enterprise sector if it comes to Java enabled cell phones or handhelds. regards daniel s. haischt -- > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > Von: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[email protected]] > Gesendet: Montag, 6. Januar 2003 19:24 > An: Avalon Developers List > Betreff: Re: [A5:RT] Minimum J2ME Specs and Strategy > > > > > Andrzej Jan Taramina wrote: > > Marc and others have assumed: > > > > > >>However, most development is currently going on on CLDC + > >>MIDP capable cell phones and PDA devices and a framework for > componentized > >>services could be a great product on these platforms. > > > > > > Be careful of making the cell phone/PDA assumption. I believe > there is a more > > pressing and larger market opportunity in the embedded systems > arena (eg. > > manufacturing process control, and the like). The consumer > device market is > > probably not as attractive a platform for Avalon 5 in this respect. > > > > A slimmed down Avalon container/framework would be ideal for > this market > > segment since lifecycle support, modularity and container > support will be key > > to support such embedded controllers. > > I'm very interested about using Avalon for PLC-based controllers. > You see, we are an automation firm, and PLC programming is a mess. I > want to see what can be done to make next-generation automation control > using Avalon. > > So yes, this is definately a cool idea :-) > > -- > Nicola Ken Barozzi [email protected] > - verba volant, scripta manent - > (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[email protected]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[email protected]> > > >