Re: An Avalon Roadmap?
Berin Loritsch <[email protected]> Tue, 07 Jan 2003 22:34:14 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.apps.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Peter Donald wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 02:46, Berin Loritsch wrote: > >>>- get a better build system in place (centipede, maven or >>>something else) >> >>So far Centipede and Maven are the best choices. As long as we >>need to add in our own tasks like generating meta-data, or generating >>bytecode, then Centipede might be the better choice for two reaons: > > > You have got to be kidding! > > Maven rocks and Jelly is far more flexible way to integrate stuff. With the > new features in Maven CVS there really doesn't seem to be any technical > reason not to go with it. > Have you tried centipede lately? Like I said in another thread, I compared the last releases from them both. If Maven has a butt-load of additional features that are not in the current release, then I would like to see it in action.