RE: [INSTRUMENTATION] integration question

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 1:40 PM
> To: Avalon Developers List
> Subject: [INSTRUMENTATION] integration question
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Berin Loritsch wrote:
> 
> >>From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>
> >>Based on the build file there appear to be the following 
> dependencies.
> >>    
> >>
> 
> <snip>
> 
> >>  excalibur-instrument                         0.3   UNRELEASED
> >>  excalibur-instrument-manager                 0.3   UNRELEASED
> >>  excalibur-instrument-manager-interfaces      0.3   UNRELEASED
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Yep, we need to release these.  I think only the implementation
> >stuff has really changed, the interface is fairly constant.
> >
> 
> A question for Pete and Berin - is is possible/reasonable to isolate 
> instrumentation dependencies into a lifecycle extension handler?  Just 
> looking at the instrumentation doc pages it would appear so on an 
> initial read - however the doc is more focused on the client usage 
> point of view as distinct from the container perspective.
> 
> Any thoughts ?


Definitely doable.