[Fwd: Re: [vote] plans for turbine 2.3] A note from the turbine list about logging

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [vote] plans for turbine 2.3
Date: 10 Dec 2002 20:15:27 -0500
From: James Taylor <[email protected]>
Reply-To: Turbine Developers List <[email protected]>
To: turbine-dev <[email protected]>
References: <BA1BD0EF.4724A%[email protected]>


> > Anyway, I will propose again to our list that we use the Logger
> > interface somehow in the new Avalon 5, or try somehow to reunite the scism.
> 
> +1
> 
> Avalon should drop whatever duplicate logging interfaces it has and adopt
> commons-logging. The same should go for Turbine and every other Jakarta
> application out there.

Agreed!

If I could implement LogEnabled, and have the logging facade provided by
the container be a commons-logging class, that would meet everyone's
needs I think. We could share the interfaces through commons, but choose
not to use the LogFactory class (and its associated discovery stuff) as
we wish.


-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   [email protected]
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------