Re: [Avalon4:PROPOSAL] Context Consensus

Leo Simons <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.apps.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 15:02, Paul Hammant wrote:
> Leo,
> 
> > >      public void contextualize (Context context) {
> > >          T myContext = (T) context;
> > >      }
> > > 
> > 
> > note: the main reason I don't like this is because it means the
> > container impl must do proxying, which is heavyweight.
> 
> The container impl will do proxying for just about everything it hands to a component.
> 
> Reason?  K/HC/CAPI separations.  We've all bought that yes?

yup. However, in the real world I'll often rip an avalon component from
somewhere else and insert it into another application where I want
minimal overhead. Proxying is _good_, but I don't want it to be a
_requirment_ of avalon-framework.

cheers,

- Leo
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.