Re: [PROPOSAL] lifecycle release
Stephen McConnell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.phoenix.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Peter Donald wrote: >On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 07:49, Berin Loritsch wrote: > > >>Furthermore, the lifecycle package addresses a common need in both >>Fortress and Merlin--alowing for a smooth migration path for users >>as they upgrade their containers. >> >> > >Then why not merge it into fortress? If Merlin is the successor of Fortress >then that should be no problem. > >BTW I was not -1'ing a release (which is impossible) but that it be considered >a "optional" extension to the framework contracts. It is a hack shared by >fortress and Merlin > Peter: I'm so glad your back! Knowing that day-to-day I have your considered remarks, insightful comments and astute observations to look forward to - it gives me a "warm and fluffy feeling" ... you know ... like pissing in a wetsuit. If only you could dedicate more of your time to the same. Heck - the whole world could be a warmer fluffier place and we would all have you to thank for it. Cheers, Steve. ;-) -- Stephen J. McConnell mailto:[email protected] http://www.osm.net