RE: [PROPOSAL] lifecycle release

> From: Peter Donald [mailto:[email protected]] 
> 
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 03:49, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> >   * that the package be migrated from the avalon-sandbox
> >     CVS to the avalon CVS as a separate project along-side
> >     the avalon framework
> 
> -1 as it does not belong at same level as framework.
> 
> >   * the release of the avalon-lifecycle package shall be
> >     considered as an "optional" extension to the framework
> >     contracts
> 
> -1 
> 
> It is the same approach that has been done before and failed 
> and can't cleanly 
> produce some aspects like delayed activation, passivation, 
> persistence, 
> transaction demarcation, bifuricating interception etc.

I assume those things can be handled with interceptors. An
interceptor can be realized via wrapping a component in a proxy, yes?

Then if the methods in the Creator and Accessor interfaces are made to
*return* an Object, then they can be used to wrap components in
proxies.

Would this be enough to realize those use cases?

/LS