[PROPOSAL] Interceptors and Lifecycle Consensus?

"Leo Sutic" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.phoenix.devel
Message-ID <001b01c2e896$7b6a7cf0$0801a8c0__13135.7806305916$1047473382@Lagrange>
Here:

     http://www.java.no/web/moter/moteSep02/AOP_files/frame.html

is an article on interceptors.

As far as the lifecycle package is concerned, I'd like to paint a
big bullseye on that article.

The objections to the lifecycle package seem to be that it is not 
capable enough, so how about this:

 1. Release it as-is, but keep it in Excalibur
    Hey, we need to get stuff out the door.

 2. Set your GPS systems, laser guidance kits etc. to:
    http://www.java.no/web/moter/moteSep02/AOP_files/frame.html
    That's what we should be able to support.

 3. Hold off on moving lifecycle -> framework.

/LS
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.