Re: Spice Dependency (was: RE: Spice License)

On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 00:32, Leo Sutic wrote:
> Number 1: By deprecated, do you mean code marked with @deprecated,
> or code that isn't marked so, but no longer considered part of
> Avalon proper? I'm fine with removing @deprecated tags from CLI,
> if that's what you want, but I'm not fine with pulling it out
> of the compatibility project again.

funny thing is it should not be in the compatability project as I -1'ed that 
but then again maybe some people are more equal than others.

> I'll make the change and leave you in a nice, stable state. If I fuck
> up the change, I will fix it. But I don't consider this - and I see
> no reason to do so - as a perpetual committment to fix things in
> Excalibur CLI.

And theres the rub. If no one is willing to maintain it in Avalon - why is it 
in Avalon?

-- 
Cheers,

Peter Donald
*-----------------------------------------------------*
* "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, *
* and proving that there is no need to do so - almost *
* everyone gets busy on the proof."                   *
*              - John Kenneth Galbraith               *
*-----------------------------------------------------*