Re: Spice Dependency (was: RE: Spice License)

On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 07:57, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> the paragraph that follows is working from my impression that
> your 'my code broke' remark above has been pressed into service
> as a justification for some of your vetos.  if that is not the
> case, then ignore the rest of this message.

Not the case. The problem is breaking backwards compatability in library code 
for no reason or for a poor reason. If there is a good reason to break 
backwards compat then I am all for it but if there is not then it will be a 
problem ... at least if I notice and care and that mostly associated with 
stuff I use.

-- 
Cheers,

Peter Donald
"All my life I wanted to be someone; I guess I should have been more 
specific."
-- Jane Wagner