Re: [PROPOSAL] lifecycle release
Berin Loritsch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.phoenix.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: > Quoting Paul Hammant <[email protected]>: > > Does this mean that in the future the Avalon project won't host any components > but only the framework and some RI containers ?? > I thought that the new avalon.apache.org global project change was to enable > such a big code base, wasn't it ? Don't understand anymore!!! The components question is still in the air. To be fair, alot of Excalibur code is merely utility code--not components. In fact I would say most of the named projects are that way. The purpose of avalon.apache.org global project change is to allow us to focus on what we do best. Also to let us manage ourselves a little better than has been done in the past. Eventually all utility code will either be donated to other Apache projects, or through a formal process (there is the legalities that the ASF owns the code in our CVS repos) moved to a third party location that best fits it.