Re: [PROPOSAL] lifecycle release

Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>Since reaching consensus on Avalon 5 was too hard, several of you are
>>trying to push your ideas into the framework by working it thru your
>>one-man-show container.
> 
> 
> Different perspective.  Avalon 5 is in the future, but right now they have a
> mish-mash of Avalon 4, and folks like Berin instigated a major push to clean
> and polish what they have before pushing on to build something new.  Most if
> not all of the Community has rallied behind this push to clean up Avalon 4,
> and that should only be viewed as a good thing, but technically and
> socially.

I don't get it.

This list is trying to clean up Avalon 4 by adding new stuff to it?

Please, explain.