Re: [PROPOSAL] lifecycle release

Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:

> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
>>> Since reaching consensus on Avalon 5 was too hard, several of you are
>>> trying to push your ideas into the framework by working it thru your
>>> one-man-show container.
>>
>>
>>
>> Different perspective.  Avalon 5 is in the future, but right now they 
>> have a
>> mish-mash of Avalon 4, and folks like Berin instigated a major push 
>> to clean
>> and polish what they have before pushing on to build something new.  
>> Most if
>> not all of the Community has rallied behind this push to clean up 
>> Avalon 4,
>> and that should only be viewed as a good thing, but technically and
>> socially.
>
>
> I don't get it.
>
> This list is trying to clean up Avalon 4 by adding new stuff to it? 


Quoi?

-- 

Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:[email protected]
http://www.osm.net