RE: [PROPOSAL] lifecycle release
"Noel J. Bergman" <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Mar 2003 14:51:19 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.phoenix.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Berin, > Can I ask you a question? How comfortable are you with the complexities > of interception? It is not as simple and straight-forward as its main > proponent suggests. In order for it to work effectively, we need to > use a dynamically generated approach which either means incorporating > CGLib or using Dynamic Proxies. > Either way, I haven't seen where the code is really more understandable > using interceptions than the proposed extensions standard. > Don't get me wrong, interceptions are a cool concept--if the user can > be successfully hidden from the implementation details. OK ... THIS is the discussion that OUGHT to be occuring. THIS is something that can be discussed on a technical basis. So you feel that Peter's solution is based upon dynamic proxy generation as the core tool to solve the issues. The hammer that makes everything look like a nail, if you will. And you feel that the Lifecycle proposal has different characteristics? OK ... now please elaborate on these topics. --- Noel