Re: [PROPOSAL] lifecycle release

Noel J. Bergman wrote:

>Leo,
>
>  
>
>>Pete definately has a point wrt interceptor architecture (it really
>>is the "next big thing", except it is become the "current big thing"
>>fast).
>>    
>>
>
>Would you comment on your view of the relative technical merits of the two
>proposals that are on the table, the interceptor architecture and the
>lifecycle proposal?
>

Noel:

Just for reference there is another thread between Jakob Praher and 
myself in which the we have discussed some of the semantic differences 
between the notion of interceptors and the notion of lifecycle interfaces.

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=104755526600001&r=1&w=2

Cheers, Steve.

>
>	--- Noel
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>
>  
>

-- 

Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:[email protected]
http://www.osm.net