Re: [PROPOSAL] lifecycle release
Stefano Mazzocchi <[email protected]> Sat, 15 Mar 2003 15:48:58 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.phoenix.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stephen McConnell wrote: > The framework is not being touched. Then all my points where moot. Sorry for wasting your time over my misunderstanding. > Ok - I have no problem with a reference to Merlin as a one-man-commit > effort. Ok. > Ok, technically I'm wrong - there are at least 3 others that > have comitted to Merlin and at least 6 that has submitted patches. Yeah, well, this doesn't count as a community-driven design methodology in my book. Hopefully it doesn't in yours as well. > Bottom line - would I want it to be any different - yes and no. No in > that I have may hands full getting Merlin to a state where I am ready to > say to the rest of the Avalon Community "here it is, let's go". Nice to hear that. > Until > that time I'm happy to be somewhat in control. Oh, I have no problems whatsoever in one person having control of a proposal for a new generation of software. I've done it myself several times and I've seen people doing it without creating community problems. > But please recognize that > control is relative. Control in this context means multiple days > responding to the wims of the avalon community. Ok, yes - it would be > nice to have a couple of other comitters pumping away - but to be honest > - its just not stable enough at this time and they would probably cause > more work than assistance. Take for example the patches from Jörg to > internationalize the command line interface - the CLI logic has been > restructured and not the German language messages he submitted are > inconsistent with the behavior. > > To be really honest - a few more weeks is needed. The service access > mechanisms on the Block interface need top be finalized and there is a > bunch of documentation that needs to be updated. After that it's open game. don't feel pushed. I don't want to push anybody, just to understand. Now that my alarms set by misunderstanding are off and now that I was able to get people recognize that if a valuable committer has a problem with the technical issues involved the community should value his contribution (no matter what language he/she used to express it), I'm happy and I can go back to work. Please understand that I don't have time/energy to follow deeply the technical discussions here on avalon-land. I just want to make sure this community is happy and safe and healthy so that I can finally leave with lots of trust. i'm getting more and more closer to that point. And this is making me happy and it's a good thing. Stefano.