Re: [PROPOSAL] lifecycle release

Noel,

>>BTW, I'm still thinking about the logging thing.
>>Imagine that we have all logging calls done like this:
>>  //@log("hello log");
>>we would have logging disabled by default, but we can transform the
>>class to use logging when running
>>    
>>
>
>We do something similar in James with Ant, but the changes are at compile
>time.
>
Ahhh.  Kewl - two jars for each package.

- Paul