Re: [PROPOSAL] lifecycle release

Nicola Ken Barozzi <[email protected]> Tue, 18 Mar 2003 09:03:54 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.phoenix.devel
Organization Apache Software Foundation
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Noel J. Bergman wrote, On 18/03/2003 0.19:
>>why can't the compiler do it? Taht would be a cool AOPed compiler.
>>Imagine that we feed the compiler a filesystem that has file
>>requests intercepted by filters... an extensible compiler! ;-)
> 
> 
> See OpenJava: http://openjava.sourceforge.net/.

Yes, I've seen it, thanks. It looks like one of the most complete 
preprocessing systems. I've also looked at EPP, Jaco, and others.

It seems to me that this project is far more complete and comprehensive 
than the idea I'm playing with. I also don't want the java code to be 
incompatible with normal compilers (hence the comment), and to KISS 
there should be no info to the processor on the context of the file, 
just what pertains to it. It's up to the programmer to ensure that 
references to objects are correct.

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   [email protected]
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------