Re: [PROPOSAL] lifecycle release
Peter Donald <[email protected]> Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:43:41 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.phoenix.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <200303182143.41167.peter__49261.8081778803$1047983181@realityforge.org> |
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 20:55, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> One thing if for sure: the java syntax was not designed to be aspect
> orientable. so every solution will be partially hacky. We have to accept
> his until the new best-of-breed language comes around.
I dunno. I think javadoc tags are perfect for the job of declaring metadata
(which is an independent concern of aspects).
Aspects are completely different and *may* choose to use the rich data, may be
hardwired, may be application configured etc. I also prefer to have aspects
at boundaries.
Given that we are mainly doing COP that mostly occurs at interfaces which is
perfect given that interceptors + dynamic proxies can fill that gap.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
A right is not what someone gives you; it's what no one can take from you.
-- Ramsey Clark