Re: [PROPOSAL] lifecycle release

Peter Donald <[email protected]> Wed, 19 Mar 2003 19:39:53 +1100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.phoenix.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.turbine.maven.devel
Message-ID <200303191939.53738.peter__42677.8298723095$1048063702@realityforge.org>
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 18:32, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> If I have logging in many places in my app, it means that I *need* it
> there, like asserts... ever tried moving asserts outside of the code?

yep. We did in Avalon actually. Theres quite a few Design-By-Constraints 
toolkits out there and I actually have a written a DBC interceptor that 
performs validation as appropriate.

> For me logging, asserts, etc I call them "concerns" rather than
> "aspects". They are not part of the application architecture, but are a
> common concern for all classes.

Depends on the logging. System level logging, entrance to methods, or resource 
usage I would consider something controllable by AOP but domain level logging 
is different kettle of fish.

-- 
Cheers,

Peter Donald
*------------------------------------*
|    God has no religion - Gandhi    |
*------------------------------------*