RE: todo list (was: Re: [PROPOSAL] lifecycle release)
"Leo Sutic" <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:24:49 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.phoenix.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.turbine.maven.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000601c2eeba$2f473a00$0801a8c0@Lagrange> |
It is my understanding that a work is copyrighted automatically, copyright notice or not, as soon as it exist on any transfer medium (i.e. not just in my head). The University of Washington seems to agree with this: http://depts.washington.edu/uwcopy/information/copyrightlaw/1.shtml "Copyright protection subsists... in original works of authorship fixed=20 in any tangible medium of expression... from which they can be perceived,=20 reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of=20 a machine or device." 17 USC =A7102(a)=20 I think this is standard practice internationally. A copyright notice is *not* needed for copyright protection. You get that automatically. /LS > From: Peter Donald [mailto:[email protected]]=20