Re: todo list
Stefano Mazzocchi <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Mar 2003 13:02:14 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.phoenix.devel,gmane.comp.jakarta.turbine.maven.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Wednesday 19 March 2003 21:53, Leo Simons wrote: > >>Peter Donald wrote: >> >>>So if it was created in 2000 and edited in all years since it would be >>>2000-2003, if it was edited in 2000 and again this year it would be >>>2000,2003 or various other combinations (ie 2000-2001,2003). >> >>We talked about this on the PMC list recently (or was it here?). The >>resolution was that it is not terribly important from a legal POV to >>update this copyright information very exactly. If something is marked >>as copyrighted in 2000, it will remain copyrighted for the next 50 years >>or so (forgot the exact number); not renewing the copyright claim simply >>means that after that time the copyright becomes non-enforcable. > > > Maybe I'm too frivolous on this, and missing something truely important. > > What happens in 2050, when Apache looses the Copyright?? Apache looses copyright of the stuff that hasn't been touched in 50 years. I think I would love to see software that is 50 years old just die! > It becomes FREE, freer than ASL !! ?? Yes. It's called 'public domain' and it's different. > Today I CAN take the code and do something else with it, without consulting > Apache, I can spawn it, make it commercial, practically anything except > leveraging on the Apache name. > What more can I do IF ASF didn't have copyright on a particular file? Call it RedHat Apache. Stefano.