Re: @avalon

Peter Donald wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 07:57, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> 
>>It's a name for crying out loud, what's to mature?
> 
> And Poolable is just a marker interface for crying out loud, whats to mature?

Its code.

>>All we are doing is establishing the name, and some values that could
>>be used.
>>
>>Is that too much to ask?
> 
> no - but why do you need to do it in avalon namespace. When there is consensus 
> then standardize on it. (And I do not consider consensus to be simple 
> majority votes).

The only thing holding up consensus is you.  So what would it take to
change your mind?

I am asking for three standard names:

@avalon.component (in phoenix already)
@avalon.service   (in phoenix already)
@avalon.lifestyle (proposed)

I don't recall us comming to consensus on avalon.component and
avalon.service and yet you chose to use the avalon namespace.

So I want to add one more standard name, what's the problem from
your viewpoint?