RE: Components do not have to be services?

"Stephen McConnell" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.user
Message-ID <000201c49205$01cf6f80$1601a8c0@gloria>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Foiles, Doug [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 04 September 2004 00:12
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Components do not have to be services?
> 
> I understand that components do not have to be services.  I would only
> mark a component as a service if I want it "injected" into another 
> component. I would of course setup dependencies on it from other 
> components that require it.  Any pitfalls in making a component a
> service when it does not need to be?  Thanks.

If you declare that a class is a component then it will be validated if
the jar file is used within Merlin.  If validation fails then a warning
leg message will be generated but no runtime failure will occur.  

Stephen.


> Doug
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.