Re: Working from home and docking

"Samuel Ferrer" <[email protected]> Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:54:32 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I am sorry ... I am about to sumerge myself deep in to the coding ...have 
mercy with a Merlin  junior like me.  I know that when you get the first 
sample you will get excited about it ... because is not only challenging but 
very powerfull in terms of distributed team develoment ...

the next message will be a study case with a apecific implementation.

I intend to use the injection/phased capability of Merlin to instanciate 
components.

My idea is to develop a wrapper,  that should be the same for every 
component.

The wrapper can be either two things depending on its descriptor data:

- a proxy that talks to the tree on the remote merlin machine
- a file transfer/instanciator of the tree on the merlin machine

When a new deveoper registers him self with a tree, he should specify its 
location and initialization mode (remote or local) ... and thats all is 
required.

Other parameters could be which data has to be leased and how frequently it 
should be updated.

After this the developer will have the impression that he has been working 
locally, hopefully without noticing that perhaps the tree is been tested on 
the target machine (like the ultime x programming ... test and test and test 
and test again ... this time without being aware when)

Of course every tree would need a status telling in which phase of 
development it is. So the central tree can reject an automatic deployment in 
case of an undesirable status.

I hope I can get down to code next time. This is pretty much what I want to 
do.

Saludos
Maquina

>From: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]>
>Reply-To: "Avalon framework users" <[email protected]>
>To: "Avalon framework users" <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: Working from home and docking
>Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 03:51:43 +0800
>
>On Tuesday 19 October 2004 03:40, Samuel Ferrer wrote:
>
> > ... I see that this is a sensitive subject and is taking too long ... I
> > would drop it and focus on something everybody agrees is really needed.
>
>That is not the case. :o)
>
>I am just trying to figure out what you are trying to do.
>You are far too abstract and/or leaving out too much details for me to get 
>the
>picture.
>
>Please, talk in terms of Java classes, object instances, configuration 
>files,
>persistence stores or something else more tangible for a poor fellow like
>myself.
>
>Providing MIR as an example of 'docking' doesn't help. I could be docking
>source code, class files, Jars, blocks, live instances, and possibly other
>things.
>
>Cheers
>Niclas
>--
>    +------//-------------------+
>   / http://www.bali.ac        /
>  / http://niclas.hedhman.org /
>+------//-------------------+
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.com/