Re: Avalon vs EJB [was; Avalon and EJB]

Guys
You really figured all out ...  congratulations!!!

I have a project in mind, which is very interesting ... and I will use Metro 
... all the way.

//maquina

>From: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]>
>Reply-To: "Avalon framework users" <[email protected]>
>To: "Avalon framework users" <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: Avalon vs EJB [was; Avalon and EJB]
>Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 03:33:21 +0800
>
>On Thursday 25 November 2004 03:25, Samuel Ferrer wrote:
>
> > Don't compare EJB with Metro ...
>
>Everyone who has seen both would say that. :o)
>
> > (and I wander if is possible to put scripts on the context map, so the
> > needs of the component can be defined at a syntax level supported by an
> > ortogonal small set of semantics --it means actual entry values)
>
>No but you can create your own Context entries, i.e. the component can 
>declare
>a "requirement" of a context entry, which you can supply in the assembly
>descriptor (a.k.a the block).
>
>Cheers
>Niclas
>--
>    +------//-------------------+
>   / http://www.dpml.net       /
>  / http://niclas.hedhman.org /
>+------//-------------------+
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/