Re: proposal to post deprecation notice on BCEL webpage

Torsten Curdt <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.bcel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> Given the nearly universal opinion expressed in the recent email thread
> titled "comparison between BCEL and ASM":
>  http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bcel-dev&m=111149200909727&w=2
> I think it would be a good idea to update the BCEL welcome page to note
> that while BCEL will continue to be maintained, new users are encouraged
> to use ASM.

...only bugfixing the last release?

> Are there any objections to me doing this? If I don't hear any within
> the next 3 days I will make this change to the website.

Hm... that's quite a big thing.
We should do a vote on that.

Maybe it would be worth also
asking on bcel-user what they
think about that.

I personally would like to play
a bit with ASM before casting
my vote.

cheers
--
Torsten
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 186 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFCi/EuBGM6V3wgCUERAuLPAJ4mT8E6UfYPH/KJaA39xCKq9u54sgCfTao1
1Rz2McOjEO7hPo0C5FPtzl0=
=1bGa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.