Re: proposal to post deprecation notice on BCEL webpage

>>...only bugfixing the last release?
> 
> 
> Probably. Not *necessarily*, but it depends upon developers stepping up
> to do stuff.

ok

> Right now, we have a tiny bit of your time, and a tiny bit of Dave's
> time. That's the entire development commitment. 

>>Hm... that's quite a big thing.
>>We should do a vote on that.
> 
> 
> Ok, fair enough.

ok

>>Maybe it would be worth also
>>asking on bcel-user what they
>>think about that.
> 
> 
> Well, their opinion is irrelevant unless they volunteer to do
> significant development on BCEL, or are willing to provide funds to hire
> someone to do BCEL development. See my comment re developer time above.
> 
> I guess we could do a "wake up" call on the user list to see if anyone
> is actually motivated enough to become a BCEL developer..

yes, that sounds good

>>I personally would like to play
>>a bit with ASM before casting
>>my vote.
> 
> 
> Please do.
> 
> There's no hurry on this, so I'll wait until you've made up your mind
> before calling a vote. Will you be able to do this within the next 2
> weeks?

unfortunately not ...I am offline
for vactation for the next two weeks
3-4 weeks would be doable. ok?

cheers
--
Torsten

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFCjXqgBGM6V3wgCUERAuWEAJ9CX5I7snxnGXCqIdaZwrSwzDGOxwCaA5bn
LtmANH9j8WEb3xZxVJgAffU=
=FO/w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----