Re: proposal to post deprecation notice on BCEL webpage

Hi,

Torsten Curdt did say that he wanted to check out ASM a little first
before casting his vote. He's away on holiday at the moment, but due
back shortly. As there's no big rush on this, I suggest we hold off
until Torsten has had a chance to make up his mind. When Torsten returns
would also be a good time to notify the user list of this, and give them
a chance to discuss it too (though of course if they just say "we want
BCEL fixed, though we're not going to do anything about it" then too
bad :-).

Regards,

Simon

On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 15:42 -0400, Dave Brosius wrote:
> I'm +1 to suggest asm for new projects.
> 
> A decision should be made as to what still-open bugs should be included for 
> a bug fix release.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Henri Yandell" <[email protected]>
> To: "BCEL Developers List" <[email protected]>; 
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 11:05 PM
> Subject: Re: proposal to post deprecation notice on BCEL webpage
> 
> 
> I'm +1 to:
> 
> 1) Provide a link to ASM on the site with explanation that we
> recommend ASM for most people considering using BCEL for the first
> time.
> 2) That we release a bugfix version of BCEL as soon as the bugs are
> fixed. I'll happily volunteer to do the release manager bit if
> desired.
> 3) That very buggy features could be removed if the effort to fix
> their bugs is sufficiently larger than the effort to migrate to the
> ASM feature.
> 
> Hen
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>