Re: BCEL and 1.5?
"Dave Brosius" <[email protected]> Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:33:28 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.bcel.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <005701c56bb9$4f401a10$607596d1@MBFG> |
Super. The first place to start is http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=BCEL&content= Luckily many have suggested fixes. It's just a matter of making sure the problem is understood, and the solution suggested is the right one. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bil Lewis" <[email protected]> To: "BCEL Users List" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 3:30 PM Subject: Re: BCEL and 1.5? > Dave, > > I'll offer to help. > > What kind of bugs are you seeing? I'd like to know. > > Is it just that the 1.5 compiler outputs different code that's > the problem? The bug I tracked down could have shown up in 1.4, > but I guess the compiler just never output that code. > > AFTER I fixed the bug, I found the repository and saw that someone > else had already fixed it in the exact same way. I like tracking > down bugs. > > -Bil > > > > > On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Dave Brosius wrote: > >> Well, not explicitly, no. >> >> A good thing would be to frame what belongs in the next release >> Probably the actual work to accomplish this isn't too much actually. >> It would probably be good to have a group pow-wow as to the current >> bugs, and decide what to do with them. >> >> --dave >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Simon Kitching" <[email protected]> >> To: "BCEL Users List" <[email protected]> >> Cc: "Bil Lewis" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 6:01 PM >> Subject: Re: BCEL and 1.5? >> >> >> > Hi Dave, >> > >> > Has anyone offered to help you with this work? >> > >> > If not, do you have the time and energy to complete this (both a bugfix >> > release and a 1.5-features release) yourself? >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Simon >> > >> > On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 17:53 -0400, [email protected] wrote: >> >> The current feeling is that a bug fix release should be released >> >> before >> >> tackling >> >> any feature work. There is some preliminary annotations support work >> >> that >> >> is >> >> currently commented out, and some other minor things like version ids, >> >> etc. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Quoting Bil Lewis <[email protected]>: >> >> >> >> > What's the status here? >> > >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> > >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >